My Blog

Homeowner Standing to Oppose Foreclosure Based on Pooling-And-Servicing Agreement

Posted by Jeffrey Foster | Dec 22, 2012 | 0 Comments

The ruling by the Circuit Court for Wastenaw County, Michigan in HSBC v. Young represents a monumental sea change for homeowners seeking to utilize a pooling-and-servicing agreement (PSA) to challenge a lender's standing to foreclose.  The facts in Young are similar to many securitized mortgage cases.  Wells Fargo originated a refinance mortgage loan on April 22, 2004.  The Young loan was allegedly destined for Wells Fargo Home Equity Trust 2004-2 ("Trust").  The Trust's PSA required that all mortgages and notes be transferred into the Trust by September 29, 2004.  The PSA also required that the mortgages transferred into the Trust not be in default.  However, the note was not assigned to HSBC until October 8, 2008.  At this time, the note was in default.

After HSBC utilized a credit bid to purchase the Young house, it initiated an ejectment action against Young.  In response, Young requested to view the original promissory note.  The note produced by HSBC was payable to Wells Fargo and had no endorsements or allonges.  Not surprisingly, HSBC produced another copy of the note a month later.  This copy contained a stamped and typed endorsement to HSBC as Trustee.  The stamped endorsement contained no date or notary stamp.  Given the foregoing, Young alleged that neither the note nor the mortgage was validly or effectively transferred to HSBC.  HSBC alleged that Young did not maintain standing to enforce the PSA provisions regarding the timing of the transfer from Wells Fargo to HSBC or the requirement that a loan not be in default at the time of transfer into the Trust.

The Court ruled that, unlike Gumapac v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co ., Michigan maintains no law that prohibits a nonparty to an assignment to have standing to challenge the validity of the assignment.  Therefore, because Michigan law permits a debtor to raise a challenge to the enforceability of a mortgage instrument in order to avoid paying the debt twice, the Court ruled that Young maintains standing to challenge the 2008 assignment.

It will be interesting to see whether HSBC appeals this ruling and how courts around the country choose to utilize the Court's reasoning to find in favor of the homeowner.

About the Author

Jeffrey Foster

Attorney Jeffrey Foster is the founding partner of Foster Law Offices. An accomplished litigation and transaction attorney, Jeff proudly represents Washington individuals and businesses in legal matters Personal Injury, Bankruptcy, Real Estate and Civil Litigation.


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Foster Law Offices

Flo trans logo

With offices on the Big Island of Hawaii and Washington State, Foster Law Offices represents clients in personal injury and real estate matters. We are also available for representation in a wide range of civil litigation cases.

Strategic Advocacy, Friendly Service.

Attorney Jeffrey Foster proudly represents individuals and business who are looking for representation and strategic legal advice. From Kailua-Kona to Honolulu to Seattle, Tacoma and Everett, Mr. Foster takes great pride in his cases and the results obtained for his clients. Thank you for visiting the online home for Mr. Foster's Hawaii practice, Foster Law Offices LLLC and his Washington practice, The Law Offices of Jeffrey E. Foster, PLLC. We look forward to the opportunity to assist you in resolving your case, claim, transaction or litigation matter. Thank you and Mahalo.